Algorithmic fact checking will go mainstream in 2023.
Teams of computer scientists around the globe have already developed AI systems designed to detect manipulated media, misinformation or fake news.
Some types of verification are well-suited to a high-tech approach: A team from Drexel Univeristy recently published a new approach for detecting forged and manipulated videos. Their system combines forensic analysis with deep learning to detect fake videos that would slip past human reviewers or existing systems.
But fact-checking isn’t usually so straightforward. A quote might be accurate, but misleading. Every news story is built on a subjective frame of what’s included — or excluded. That nuance, however, is lost when researchers test a new AI model against benchmark datasets that catalog posts as true or false.
The researchers who are developing cutting edge AI fact-checking systems today measure their accuracy to the hundredth of a percent against benchmark datasets of social media posts and articles. That’s the standard way for artificial intelligence researchers to test and share their results, but it’s not well-suited to supporting journalists on deadline or platforms that need to make moderation decisions at scale.
The teams building these tools are well-intentioned, but their work risks being a high-tech Maginot Line: A defense against misleading COVID tweets from 2020 that can’t anticipate — or respond to — the next iteration of information warfare.
The challenge for journalists, however, will be if these tools are widely adopted by social media platforms, ISPs, or content-managment systems. Fake and misleading stories might still circulate because bad actors would have the resources to engineer ways around the automated tools. Reporters, on the other hand, might find their work blocked as investigations and enterprise reporting lack the precedent in the AI’s model to appear “true.”
But it doesn’t need to be that way.
Journalists can engage with the technologists who are working in this space to improve — and direct — their work. As an industry we can wrestle with the ethics of letting machines audit and improve our reporting. We can be open to the disruptive power of artificial intelligence at all points in our value chain, instead of closing ourselves off and assuming the future will look just like today.
If we spend 2023 waiting for the killer AI app that will save journalism, we won’t like the results. We’ll wind up playing catch-up, as we have with each wave of technological disruption for the last two decades.
But if we use the coming year to act — by tracking the technologies that will shape our industry, by building partnerships that equip our organizations to grow, by taking stock of the skills we need in the newsroom — we can have agency over our future.
We can create a future where AI is a tool for making journalism more sustainable instead of inhabiting a future created by others
Sam Guzik leads product strategy for WNYC and is a foresight expert advisor at the Future Today Institute.
Algorithmic fact checking will go mainstream in 2023.
Teams of computer scientists around the globe have already developed AI systems designed to detect manipulated media, misinformation or fake news.
Some types of verification are well-suited to a high-tech approach: A team from Drexel Univeristy recently published a new approach for detecting forged and manipulated videos. Their system combines forensic analysis with deep learning to detect fake videos that would slip past human reviewers or existing systems.
But fact-checking isn’t usually so straightforward. A quote might be accurate, but misleading. Every news story is built on a subjective frame of what’s included — or excluded. That nuance, however, is lost when researchers test a new AI model against benchmark datasets that catalog posts as true or false.
The researchers who are developing cutting edge AI fact-checking systems today measure their accuracy to the hundredth of a percent against benchmark datasets of social media posts and articles. That’s the standard way for artificial intelligence researchers to test and share their results, but it’s not well-suited to supporting journalists on deadline or platforms that need to make moderation decisions at scale.
The teams building these tools are well-intentioned, but their work risks being a high-tech Maginot Line: A defense against misleading COVID tweets from 2020 that can’t anticipate — or respond to — the next iteration of information warfare.
The challenge for journalists, however, will be if these tools are widely adopted by social media platforms, ISPs, or content-managment systems. Fake and misleading stories might still circulate because bad actors would have the resources to engineer ways around the automated tools. Reporters, on the other hand, might find their work blocked as investigations and enterprise reporting lack the precedent in the AI’s model to appear “true.”
But it doesn’t need to be that way.
Journalists can engage with the technologists who are working in this space to improve — and direct — their work. As an industry we can wrestle with the ethics of letting machines audit and improve our reporting. We can be open to the disruptive power of artificial intelligence at all points in our value chain, instead of closing ourselves off and assuming the future will look just like today.
If we spend 2023 waiting for the killer AI app that will save journalism, we won’t like the results. We’ll wind up playing catch-up, as we have with each wave of technological disruption for the last two decades.
But if we use the coming year to act — by tracking the technologies that will shape our industry, by building partnerships that equip our organizations to grow, by taking stock of the skills we need in the newsroom — we can have agency over our future.
We can create a future where AI is a tool for making journalism more sustainable instead of inhabiting a future created by others
Sam Guzik leads product strategy for WNYC and is a foresight expert advisor at the Future Today Institute.
Anthony Nadler Confronting media gerrymandering
Johannes Klingebiel The innovation team, R.I.P.
Julia Angwin Democracies will get serious about saving journalism
Peter Bale Rising costs force more digital innovation
Ryan Nave Citizen journalism, but make it equitable
Nicholas Jackson There will be launches — and we’ll keep doing the work
Mary Walter-Brown and Tristan Loper Mission-driven metrics become our North Star
Eric Nuzum A focus on people instead of power
Gina Chua The traditional story structure gets deconstructed
Sue Schardt Toward a new poetics of journalism
Ryan Gantz “I’m sorry, but I’m a large language model”
J. Siguru Wahutu American journalism reckons with its colonialist tendencies
Kaitlyn Wells We’ll prioritize media literacy for children
Jarrad Henderson Video editing will help people understand the media they consume
Brian Stelter Finding new ways to reach news avoiders
Masuma Ahuja Journalism starts working for and with its communities
Michael Schudson Journalism gets more and more difficult
Victor Pickard The year journalism and capitalism finally divorce
Alexandra Svokos Working harder to reach audiences where they are
Anika Anand Independent news businesses lead the way on healthy work cultures
Ryan Kellett Airline-like loyalty programs try to tie down news readers
Jennifer Choi and Jonathan Jackson Funders finally bet on next-generation news entrepreneurs
Amy Schmitz Weiss Journalism education faces a crossroads
Cindy Royal Yes, journalists should learn to code, but…
Gabe Schneider Well-funded journalism leaders stop making disparate pay
Cory Bergman The AI content flood
Jessica Maddox Journalists keep getting manipulated by internet culture
Jody Brannon We’ll embrace policy remedies
John Davidow A year of intergenerational learning
Ben Werdmuller The internet is up for grabs again
Susan Chira Equipping local journalism
Sarah Marshall A web channel strategy won’t be enough
Juleyka Lantigua Newsrooms recognize women of color as the canaries in the coal mine
Stefanie Murray The year U.S. media stops screwing around and becomes pro-democracy
Emily Nonko Incarcerated reporters get more bylines
Wilson Liévano Diaspora journalism takes the next step
Richard Tofel The press might get better at vetting presidential candidates
Kirstin McCudden We’ll codify protection of journalism and newsgathering
Hillary Frey Death to the labor-intensive memo for prospective hires
Cassandra Etienne Local news fellowships will help fight newsroom inequities
Zizi Papacharissi Platforms are over
Tamar Charney Flux is the new stability
Jim Friedlich Local journalism steps up to the challenge of civic coverage
Simon Galperin Philanthropy stops investing in corporate media
Christina Shih Shared values move from nice-to-haves to essentials
A.J. Bauer Covering the right wrong
Matt Rasnic More newsroom workers turn to organized labor
Nicholas Diakopoulos Journalists productively harness generative AI tools
Mariana Moura Santos A woman who speaks is a woman who changes the world
Joni Deutsch Podcast collaboration — not competition — breeds excellence
Errin Haines Journalists on the campaign trail mend trust with the public
Sam Gregory Synthetic media forces us to understand how media gets made
Mar Cabra The inevitable mental health revolution
David Skok Renewed interest in human-powered reporting
Kavya Sukumar Belling the cat: The rise of independent fact-checking at scale
Amethyst J. Davis The slight of the great contraction
Jenna Weiss-Berman The economic downturn benefits the podcasting industry. (No, really!)
Jennifer Brandel AI couldn’t care less. Journalists will care more.
Kaitlin C. Miller Harassment in journalism won’t get better, but we’ll talk about it more openly
Karina Montoya More reporters on the antitrust beat
Francesco Zaffarano There is no end of “social media”
Snigdha Sur Newsrooms get nimble in a recession
Andrew Losowsky Journalism realizes the replacement for Twitter is not a new Twitter
Rachel Glickhouse Humanizing newsrooms will be a badge of honor
Janelle Salanga Journalists work from a place of harm reduction
Sue Robinson Engagement journalism will have to confront a tougher reality
Dana Lacey Tech will screw publishers over
Taylor Lorenz The “creator economy” will be astroturfed
Ariel Zirulnick Journalism doubles down on user needs
Burt Herman The year AI truly arrives — and with it the reckoning
Peter Sterne AI enters the newsroom
Walter Frick Journalists wake up to the power of prediction markets
Megan Lucero and Shirish Kulkarni The future of journalism is not you
Jonas Kaiser Rejecting the “free speech” frame
Andrew Donohue We’ll find out whether journalism can, indeed, save democracy
Doris Truong Workers demand to be paid what the job is worth
Alexandra Borchardt The year of the climate journalism strategy
Tre'vell Anderson Continued culpability in anti-trans campaigns
Sam Guzik AI will start fact-checking. We may not like the results.
Cari Nazeer and Emily Goligoski News organizations step up their support for caregivers
Ståle Grut Your newsroom experiences a Midjourney-gate, too
Anita Varma Journalism prioritizes the basic need for survival
Brian Moritz Rebuilding the news bundle
Basile Simon Towards supporting criminal accountability
Joe Amditis AI throws a lifeline to local publishers
Josh Schwartz The AI spammers are coming
Nikki Usher This is the year of the RSS reader. (Really!)
Jesse Holcomb Buffeted, whipped, bullied, pulled
Anna Nirmala News organizations get new structures
Al Lucca Digital news design gets interesting again
Mauricio Cabrera It’s no longer about audiences, it’s about communities
An Xiao Mina Journalism in a time of permacrisis
Elizabeth Bramson-Boudreau More of the same
Upasna Gautam Technology that performs at the speed of news
Gordon Crovitz The year advertisers stop funding misinformation
Danielle K. Brown and Kathleen Searles DEI efforts must consider mental health and online abuse
Raney Aronson-Rath Journalists will band together to fight intimidation
Larry Ryckman We’ll work together with our competitors
Kathy Lu We need emotionally agile newsroom leaders
Priyanjana Bengani Partisan local news networks will collaborate
Khushbu Shah Global reporting will suffer
Valérie Bélair-Gagnon Well-being will become a core tenet of journalism
Bill Grueskin Local news will come to rely on AI
Jacob L. Nelson Despite it all, people will still want to be journalists
Leezel Tanglao Community partnerships drive better reporting
Mario García More newsrooms go mobile-first
Paul Cheung More news organizations will realize they are in the business of impact, not eyeballs
Surya Mattu Data journalists learn from photojournalists
Emma Carew Grovum The year to resist forgetting about diversity
Molly de Aguiar and Mandy Van Deven Narrative change trend brings new money to journalism
Dominic-Madori Davis Everyone finally realizes the need for diverse voices in tech reporting
Dannagal G. Young Stop rewarding elite performances of identity threat
Laxmi Parthasarathy Unlocking the silent demand for international journalism
Alex Perry New paths to transparency without Twitter
Sumi Aggarwal Smart newsrooms will prioritize board development
Laura E. Davis The year we embrace the robots — and ourselves
Christoph Mergerson The rot at the core of the news business
Mael Vallejo More threats to press freedom across the Americas
Kerri Hoffman Podcasting goes local
Shanté Cosme The answer to “quiet quitting” is radical empathy
Eric Thurm Journalists think of themselves as workers
Parker Molloy We’ll reach new heights of moral panic
Elite Truong In platform collapse, an opportunity for community
Jakob Moll Journalism startups will think beyond English
Janet Haven ChatGPT and the future of trust
Daniel Trielli Trust in news will continue to fall. Just look at Brazil.
Eric Ulken Generative AI brings wrongness at scale
Jessica Clark Open discourse retrenches
Jaden Amos TikTok personality journalists continue to rise
Moreno Cruz Osório Brazilian journalism turns wounds into action
Ayala Panievsky It’s time for PR for journalism
Sarah Alvarez Dream bigger or lose out
Eric Holthaus As social media fragments, marginalized voices gain more power
Michael W. Wagner The backlash against pro-democracy reporting is coming
Julia Beizer News fatigue shows us a clear path forward
Felicitas Carrique and Becca Aaronson News product goes from trend to standard
Martina Efeyini Talk to Gen Z. They’re the experts of Gen Z.
Tim Carmody Newsletter writers need a new ethics
Sarah Stonbely Growth in public funding for news and information at the state and local levels
Jim VandeHei There is no “peak newsletter”
Pia Frey Publishers start polling their users at scale
Joanne McNeil Facebook and the media kiss and make up
S. Mitra Kalita “Everything sucks. Good luck to you.”
Lisa Heyamoto The independent news industry gets a roadmap to sustainability
David Cohn AI made this prediction
Esther Kezia Thorpe Subscription pressures force product innovation
Don Day The news about the news is bad. I’m optimistic.
Alan Henry A reckoning with why trust in news is so low
Barbara Raab More journalism funders will take more risks
Alex Sujong Laughlin Credit where it’s due
Nicholas Thompson The year AI actually changes the media business
Joshua P. Darr Local to live, wire to wither
Bill Adair The year of the fact-check (no, really!)
Rodney Gibbs Recalibrating how we work apart
Delano Massey The industry shakes its imposter syndrome
Sarabeth Berman Nonprofit local news shows that it can scale