We’re going to see permanent, federal protections for journalists and newsgathering.
Here at Freedom of the Press Foundation, I oversee the U.S. Press Freedom Tracker, the news site that systematically documents aggressions against journalists and news organizations in the United States, which means I see the myriad threats to press freedom and the First Amendment every day.
I am not always a lot of fun at parties. It’s also a niche perch from which to monitor responses, accountability and press protections.
Since the Tracker launch in 2017, the team has documented nearly 300 arrests or detainments of journalists and nearly 1,000 assaults.
The majority of those came in 2020, as journalists covered national social justice and Black Lives Matter protests, sparked by the killing of George Floyd. We documented more than 600 assaults and 140 arrests of journalists — extraordinary numbers, as journalists reported under extraordinary physical duress.
There are hints of accountability from that time: At least 53 journalists have filed lawsuits following their treatment at BLM protests, and nearly $2 million has been awarded in settlements of these suits so far.
At the state level, California responded by passing SB 98 in 2021, which enshrined protections for the press while covering demonstrations. (The question of efficacy remains: Six journalists were arrested or detained while covering protests in the state this year, with 10 assaults.)
There are other types of threats to press freedom. Not all states have strong shield laws and there is no federal law, meaning that federal courts are inconsistent in recognizing protections for journalists against subpoenas and seizures. Many courts don’t acknowledge any protections at all. That means journalists and news organizations can be compelled to identify their sources, testify about their reporting or turn over notes or other privileged source material. Or the government can secretly ask Google or Facebook for journalists’ email or messaging records.
More than 150 subpoenas and legal orders have been issued to journalists and news organizations for this sort of information, and those are just the ones we know about.
In 2021, the U.S. Department of Justice let The New York Times know that — as part of a leak investigation during the Trump administration — it secretly obtained phone records of four of the newspaper’s reporters more than a year before. That DOJ also obtained a court order — and a gag order — demanding Google secretly turn over the email logs of those four reporters. (That particular effort continued into the Biden administration, which later issued a statement that no one at the White House was aware of the gag order until it was lifted. The court order was dropped.)
By mid-2021, the Biden DOJ announced it would no longer seize journalists’ records during leak investigations through a memorandum from Attorney General Merrick Garland. The DOJ codified the memorandum this October, officially revising the rules around seeking information and records from members of the news media except under “limited, specified circumstances.” Garland said the policies were needed because “freedom of the press requires that members of the news media have the freedom to investigate and report the news.”
But administrations change, which means so, too, can that newly revised DOJ policy. Fortunately, we’re on the cusp of federal protections with the PRESS Act.
The Protect Reporters from Exploitative State Spying Act is legislation that would prohibit the government from seizing records from journalists or their phone and email providers, except in a few emergency situations. It unanimously passed the House this September and is now awaiting Senate approval.
There’s a chance that the Senate Judiciary Committee will push it through to a full Senate vote before the session ends in January. Freedom of the Press Foundation and many others are advocating for that to happen.
Which means this prediction could become outdated even before we pop open the New Year’s champagne. Sorry, Nieman Lab, not sorry.
Kirstin McCudden is vice president of editorial for Freedom of the Press Foundation and managing editor of its U.S. Press Freedom Tracker
We’re going to see permanent, federal protections for journalists and newsgathering.
Here at Freedom of the Press Foundation, I oversee the U.S. Press Freedom Tracker, the news site that systematically documents aggressions against journalists and news organizations in the United States, which means I see the myriad threats to press freedom and the First Amendment every day.
I am not always a lot of fun at parties. It’s also a niche perch from which to monitor responses, accountability and press protections.
Since the Tracker launch in 2017, the team has documented nearly 300 arrests or detainments of journalists and nearly 1,000 assaults.
The majority of those came in 2020, as journalists covered national social justice and Black Lives Matter protests, sparked by the killing of George Floyd. We documented more than 600 assaults and 140 arrests of journalists — extraordinary numbers, as journalists reported under extraordinary physical duress.
There are hints of accountability from that time: At least 53 journalists have filed lawsuits following their treatment at BLM protests, and nearly $2 million has been awarded in settlements of these suits so far.
At the state level, California responded by passing SB 98 in 2021, which enshrined protections for the press while covering demonstrations. (The question of efficacy remains: Six journalists were arrested or detained while covering protests in the state this year, with 10 assaults.)
There are other types of threats to press freedom. Not all states have strong shield laws and there is no federal law, meaning that federal courts are inconsistent in recognizing protections for journalists against subpoenas and seizures. Many courts don’t acknowledge any protections at all. That means journalists and news organizations can be compelled to identify their sources, testify about their reporting or turn over notes or other privileged source material. Or the government can secretly ask Google or Facebook for journalists’ email or messaging records.
More than 150 subpoenas and legal orders have been issued to journalists and news organizations for this sort of information, and those are just the ones we know about.
In 2021, the U.S. Department of Justice let The New York Times know that — as part of a leak investigation during the Trump administration — it secretly obtained phone records of four of the newspaper’s reporters more than a year before. That DOJ also obtained a court order — and a gag order — demanding Google secretly turn over the email logs of those four reporters. (That particular effort continued into the Biden administration, which later issued a statement that no one at the White House was aware of the gag order until it was lifted. The court order was dropped.)
By mid-2021, the Biden DOJ announced it would no longer seize journalists’ records during leak investigations through a memorandum from Attorney General Merrick Garland. The DOJ codified the memorandum this October, officially revising the rules around seeking information and records from members of the news media except under “limited, specified circumstances.” Garland said the policies were needed because “freedom of the press requires that members of the news media have the freedom to investigate and report the news.”
But administrations change, which means so, too, can that newly revised DOJ policy. Fortunately, we’re on the cusp of federal protections with the PRESS Act.
The Protect Reporters from Exploitative State Spying Act is legislation that would prohibit the government from seizing records from journalists or their phone and email providers, except in a few emergency situations. It unanimously passed the House this September and is now awaiting Senate approval.
There’s a chance that the Senate Judiciary Committee will push it through to a full Senate vote before the session ends in January. Freedom of the Press Foundation and many others are advocating for that to happen.
Which means this prediction could become outdated even before we pop open the New Year’s champagne. Sorry, Nieman Lab, not sorry.
Kirstin McCudden is vice president of editorial for Freedom of the Press Foundation and managing editor of its U.S. Press Freedom Tracker
Dana Lacey Tech will screw publishers over
Christina Shih Shared values move from nice-to-haves to essentials
Laxmi Parthasarathy Unlocking the silent demand for international journalism
Upasna Gautam Technology that performs at the speed of news
Jonas Kaiser Rejecting the “free speech” frame
Valérie Bélair-Gagnon Well-being will become a core tenet of journalism
David Skok Renewed interest in human-powered reporting
Karina Montoya More reporters on the antitrust beat
Sam Guzik AI will start fact-checking. We may not like the results.
Christoph Mergerson The rot at the core of the news business
Sue Robinson Engagement journalism will have to confront a tougher reality
Dominic-Madori Davis Everyone finally realizes the need for diverse voices in tech reporting
Zizi Papacharissi Platforms are over
Gabe Schneider Well-funded journalism leaders stop making disparate pay
Anna Nirmala News organizations get new structures
Eric Thurm Journalists think of themselves as workers
Mary Walter-Brown and Tristan Loper Mission-driven metrics become our North Star
Gina Chua The traditional story structure gets deconstructed
Alexandra Svokos Working harder to reach audiences where they are
Don Day The news about the news is bad. I’m optimistic.
Leezel Tanglao Community partnerships drive better reporting
Jennifer Brandel AI couldn’t care less. Journalists will care more.
Mauricio Cabrera It’s no longer about audiences, it’s about communities
Peter Sterne AI enters the newsroom
Bill Grueskin Local news will come to rely on AI
Emma Carew Grovum The year to resist forgetting about diversity
Amethyst J. Davis The slight of the great contraction
Larry Ryckman We’ll work together with our competitors
Jaden Amos TikTok personality journalists continue to rise
Andrew Donohue We’ll find out whether journalism can, indeed, save democracy
Hillary Frey Death to the labor-intensive memo for prospective hires
Nicholas Diakopoulos Journalists productively harness generative AI tools
Burt Herman The year AI truly arrives — and with it the reckoning
Megan Lucero and Shirish Kulkarni The future of journalism is not you
Errin Haines Journalists on the campaign trail mend trust with the public
Martina Efeyini Talk to Gen Z. They’re the experts of Gen Z.
Jesse Holcomb Buffeted, whipped, bullied, pulled
Mariana Moura Santos A woman who speaks is a woman who changes the world
Matt Rasnic More newsroom workers turn to organized labor
Tamar Charney Flux is the new stability
Jody Brannon We’ll embrace policy remedies
Amy Schmitz Weiss Journalism education faces a crossroads
Ryan Kellett Airline-like loyalty programs try to tie down news readers
Ryan Gantz “I’m sorry, but I’m a large language model”
Eric Holthaus As social media fragments, marginalized voices gain more power
Richard Tofel The press might get better at vetting presidential candidates
Joshua P. Darr Local to live, wire to wither
Daniel Trielli Trust in news will continue to fall. Just look at Brazil.
Simon Galperin Philanthropy stops investing in corporate media
John Davidow A year of intergenerational learning
Sumi Aggarwal Smart newsrooms will prioritize board development
Ryan Nave Citizen journalism, but make it equitable
Kaitlin C. Miller Harassment in journalism won’t get better, but we’ll talk about it more openly
Jessica Clark Open discourse retrenches
Cory Bergman The AI content flood
Walter Frick Journalists wake up to the power of prediction markets
Sue Cross Thinking and acting collectively to save the news
Pia Frey Publishers start polling their users at scale
Delano Massey The industry shakes its imposter syndrome
Kaitlyn Wells We’ll prioritize media literacy for children
Victor Pickard The year journalism and capitalism finally divorce
Dannagal G. Young Stop rewarding elite performances of identity threat
Lisa Heyamoto The independent news industry gets a roadmap to sustainability
Alan Henry A reckoning with why trust in news is so low
Jacob L. Nelson Despite it all, people will still want to be journalists
Peter Bale Rising costs force more digital innovation
Ståle Grut Your newsroom experiences a Midjourney-gate, too
Elite Truong In platform collapse, an opportunity for community
J. Siguru Wahutu American journalism reckons with its colonialist tendencies
Ayala Panievsky It’s time for PR for journalism
Alexandra Borchardt The year of the climate journalism strategy
Brian Stelter Finding new ways to reach news avoiders
Bill Adair The year of the fact-check (no, really!)
Masuma Ahuja Journalism starts working for and with its communities
Susan Chira Equipping local journalism
Nicholas Thompson The year AI actually changes the media business
Jessica Maddox Journalists keep getting manipulated by internet culture
Johannes Klingebiel The innovation team, R.I.P.
Esther Kezia Thorpe Subscription pressures force product innovation
Sarah Marshall A web channel strategy won’t be enough
Snigdha Sur Newsrooms get nimble in a recession
Janet Haven ChatGPT and the future of trust
Sam Gregory Synthetic media forces us to understand how media gets made
Sarabeth Berman Nonprofit local news shows that it can scale
Nicholas Jackson There will be launches — and we’ll keep doing the work
Joanne McNeil Facebook and the media kiss and make up
Ben Werdmuller The internet is up for grabs again
Al Lucca Digital news design gets interesting again
Michael W. Wagner The backlash against pro-democracy reporting is coming
Joni Deutsch Podcast collaboration — not competition — breeds excellence
David Cohn AI made this prediction
Francesco Zaffarano There is no end of “social media”
Julia Beizer News fatigue shows us a clear path forward
Stefanie Murray The year U.S. media stops screwing around and becomes pro-democracy
Tre'vell Anderson Continued culpability in anti-trans campaigns
Anika Anand Independent news businesses lead the way on healthy work cultures
Elizabeth Bramson-Boudreau More of the same
Barbara Raab More journalism funders will take more risks
Anthony Nadler Confronting media gerrymandering
Rodney Gibbs Recalibrating how we work apart
Cari Nazeer and Emily Goligoski News organizations step up their support for caregivers
Michael Schudson Journalism gets more and more difficult
Shanté Cosme The answer to “quiet quitting” is radical empathy
Julia Angwin Democracies will get serious about saving journalism
Alex Sujong Laughlin Credit where it’s due
Joe Amditis AI throws a lifeline to local publishers
Laura E. Davis The year we embrace the robots — and ourselves
Jakob Moll Journalism startups will think beyond English
Khushbu Shah Global reporting will suffer
Cassandra Etienne Local news fellowships will help fight newsroom inequities
Brian Moritz Rebuilding the news bundle
Parker Molloy We’ll reach new heights of moral panic
Mario García More newsrooms go mobile-first
Wilson Liévano Diaspora journalism takes the next step
Alex Perry New paths to transparency without Twitter
Doris Truong Workers demand to be paid what the job is worth
Tim Carmody Newsletter writers need a new ethics
Josh Schwartz The AI spammers are coming
Ariel Zirulnick Journalism doubles down on user needs
Jim Friedlich Local journalism steps up to the challenge of civic coverage
Paul Cheung More news organizations will realize they are in the business of impact, not eyeballs
Jenna Weiss-Berman The economic downturn benefits the podcasting industry. (No, really!)
Mar Cabra The inevitable mental health revolution
Danielle K. Brown and Kathleen Searles DEI efforts must consider mental health and online abuse
Sarah Alvarez Dream bigger or lose out
Sue Schardt Toward a new poetics of journalism
Janelle Salanga Journalists work from a place of harm reduction
Gordon Crovitz The year advertisers stop funding misinformation
Cindy Royal Yes, journalists should learn to code, but…
Kirstin McCudden We’ll codify protection of journalism and newsgathering
Anita Varma Journalism prioritizes the basic need for survival
Surya Mattu Data journalists learn from photojournalists
Moreno Cruz Osório Brazilian journalism turns wounds into action
Emily Nonko Incarcerated reporters get more bylines
Andrew Losowsky Journalism realizes the replacement for Twitter is not a new Twitter
Jennifer Choi and Jonathan Jackson Funders finally bet on next-generation news entrepreneurs
Raney Aronson-Rath Journalists will band together to fight intimidation
Basile Simon Towards supporting criminal accountability
Eric Nuzum A focus on people instead of power
Priyanjana Bengani Partisan local news networks will collaborate
An Xiao Mina Journalism in a time of permacrisis
Kavya Sukumar Belling the cat: The rise of independent fact-checking at scale
Jim VandeHei There is no “peak newsletter”
Nikki Usher This is the year of the RSS reader. (Really!)
S. Mitra Kalita “Everything sucks. Good luck to you.”
Taylor Lorenz The “creator economy” will be astroturfed
Jarrad Henderson Video editing will help people understand the media they consume
Rachel Glickhouse Humanizing newsrooms will be a badge of honor
Juleyka Lantigua Newsrooms recognize women of color as the canaries in the coal mine
Mael Vallejo More threats to press freedom across the Americas
Kerri Hoffman Podcasting goes local
Felicitas Carrique and Becca Aaronson News product goes from trend to standard
Sarah Stonbely Growth in public funding for news and information at the state and local levels
A.J. Bauer Covering the right wrong
Kathy Lu We need emotionally agile newsroom leaders
Eric Ulken Generative AI brings wrongness at scale
Molly de Aguiar and Mandy Van Deven Narrative change trend brings new money to journalism